Saturday, August 30, 2008

Nonknowledge



Lee Welch The Quest for Hugo Vernier, 2008





Artur Żmijewski is also in an interesting looking show with these people -
Matthew Buckingham (US), Joachim Koester (DK), Benoît Maire (FR), Tine Melzer (NL/DE), Maaike Schoorel (NL), Lee Welch (IE) at the Project Arts Centre, Dublin. The show is called Nonknowledge and there I have copied a description written by the show's curator Tessa Giblin ( ex Artspace Auckland)-

“…(N)onknowledge: that which results from every proposition when we are looking to go to the fundamental depths of its content, and which makes us uneasy.” Georges Bataille

Many of the artistic practices brought together in Nonknowledge remind us of Wittgenstein’s fundamental explanation of human perception and comprehension: that we can not conceive of something we do not have the language to describe – “the limits of your language are the limits of your world”. By attuning to a language outside of common communication, artists can present an avenue for perception which both reflects on the conditions of knowing, and places the spectator on the opposite side of illumination – in the vast possibilities of nonknowledge.

The absolute authority that historical artefacts hold – and the web of histories which they both reveal and obliterate, are contested in Matthew Buckingham’s Image of Absalon To Be Projected Until It Vanishes. The quasi-mythical crusader from the Middle Ages who expanded and stabilised Danish control over its territories, Absalon was an Archbishop who embodied both the religious and military heroism of the time. A single 35 mm projected slide of the Copenhagen statue of Absalon burns out over the duration of the exhibition, altering the apparently immutable form, bathing the statue in a slow, consuming twilight of symbolism.

As Joachim Koester writes, “the history of the occult is also a history of the obscure”. In his photographic series The Morning of the Magicians, he revisits the site of an abandoned and hidden belief system – The Abbey of Thélèma, which was initiated and occupied by the occultist Aleister Crowley and his followers from 1920 – 1923 in Cefalù, Sicily. After evicting the cult in 1923, following a storm of public outrage at the methods of occult worship and tantric sex practiced by Crowley, Mussolini ordered the whitewashing of the psychedelically illustrated surfaces of the Abbey. Painstakingly restored by experimental film maker Kenneth Anger in the 1950s for a film which was eventually lost, the frescoes that remain today are a faded yet resilient representation of the belief system evoked within the now dilapidated Abbey.

The practice of Benoît Maire is based in philosophy, from which the artist engages with subject matter – both referential and formal – around him. Interested in the illusory quality that one’s ‘knowing something’ can assert over one’s ‘seeing something’, his simple sculptures are often groupings in which objects are at once reflected and extended through the space of the artwork. In L’objet de singe, négatif (object for monkey, negative), white stones sitting on the floor are reflected in a roughly-hewn Perspex plane, while in Histoire de la géometrie #5 (étude pour l’industrie), pages from books are reconfigured to stage two workers gazing at an image of an icon of industrial progress, and Copernicus’ 16th century revolutionary heliocentric diagram of the planets, including earth, orbiting around the sun.

“The first book of the day was read by the time he finished his coffee, served by his wife. The second book he read sitting right there. The third book accompanied him over to the annex building of the library.” Tine Melzer’s Readingmachine, is a collection of bound novels comprising of the same story in many different languages, and in many different styles. It is like a library of defeated stories which live in the possibility of blank pages, but inevitably succumbs to the failure of its own subject matter: the person who determined to read every book that was ever written.

The paintings of Maaike Schoorel are thick and detailed with layers of colour, texture and gesture, to the extent that any form is barely visible. Pulsing in and out of a recognisable composition, the painted surfaces are full of the all encompassing nature of white light – and confuse the senses like the hum of white noise. In Bed, Schoorel reveals the solitude of an emptied space – even in the dislocated ambiguity with which she paints, there seems to be the remembrance of warmth emanating from the crumpled sheets and exposed duvet. They are strangely liberating paintings, purposefully hovering beyond concrete comprehension, and thus allowing the potential for a multiplicity of intentions in the work – for the painter, but perhaps even more liberally, for the spectator.

Returning to the library as the holder of common history, Lee Welch has embarked on a long archival process to locate and obtain one of the oddest artefacts of the literary cannon – a provocative book by Hugo Vernier which became known through its description in George Perec’s The Winter Journey. Combing through the remains of archives and libraries, partially destroyed in WWII bombing, Perec’s protagonist Vincent Degraël searched for any remaining evidence of the book he had come across by chance, but which he believed to be the ‘blueprint’, of every subsequent achievement in 20th century French literature. At the time of his death in a psychiatric hospital, Degraël’s quest had never reached fruition – the notebook that he left behind to detail his research was 400 pages long, and the last 392 were empty.

Weaving throughout all of the works in the exhibition, at once uniting them and causing a disturbance to them, are recordings from Artur Żmijewski’s Singing Lesson II. Żmijewski brought together a choir of deaf teenagers to sing Bach in St. Thomas Church in Leipzig. In Żmijewski’s second piece, William Shakespeare, Sonnets, Huntingdon’s sufferer Wojtek Krolikiewcz performs a selection of Shakespeare’s sonnets.



“When he speaks in silence, the audience senses the effort of his will struggling with the disintegration of the body and slowly failing, slowly letting chaos take control”. Żmijewski



Curated by Tessa Giblin

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Timetable




General Timetable leading up to examination

September 1st -13th Midsemester break
The workshops will be open in their normal weekly hours.
Any questions, enquiries or to update me, please be in touch via email.

Week seven
First week back: Crits of new work, each person should provide material that can be considered completed, including consideration of presentation. There should be more than one work to discuss. In addition please bring along a selected item of research,(in what ever format makes sense in relation to your work).

Week eight
The focus will be on research material. Questions for this week are:
How is your research connected to your practice?
What is its format and how is it organised?
In what ways does it demonstrate your consideration of ideas?
Both sessions will be organised into small working groups and each member wil be asked to present their research and respond to the material they see form others in the group.
There will also be an interim course evaluation conducted at the end of the Tuesday session.(4-5pm)


Week nine

Monday session on photographing work. For the purposes of this discussion students will set photographic documentation up temporarily in seminar C room.
Tuesday Gallery visit-(details closer to the time)
Both sessions will allow time for individual conversations at the end of session.


Week ten

Presentations on external subjects that motivate artwork. Students group themselves and develop an introduction to an area of common interest. ( more information to come)
Initial ideas about space selection. This is especially important if you are hoping to present work in an area outside of studio or one likely to be in high demand.

Week eleven
Presentation crits
The group will offer input into final decision making. Students should also have a developed draft of their contextual statement to refer to and develop through conversation.
Student evaluations: students asked to participate in this process.
meetings to discuss personal timetables up until presentation.

Week twelve
Meet as a group both days to begin session followed by individual discussions


Specific examination dates will be available at the beginning of week seven, following the break.

Daria Martin









soft materials, 2004

'I HAVE TO ADMIT that the old-fashioned humanist in me was slightly shocked to realize that the "soft materials" referred to in the title of Daria Martin's 2004 film are, in fact, people'
Barry Schwabsky

The films of American artist Daria Martin (born in 1973) map out newly interpreted images of modernistic ideals and tendencies within the performative arts. A constant interchanging of performer and object challenge the viewer to re-define their perception in a world of artifice, cheap materials and alarmingly real fantasies.
She has an interest in artificial intelligence documents interaction between people and machines in her 2004 film soft materials.

Soft Materials was shot in the Artificial Intelligence Lab at the University of Zurich where scientists research 'embodied artificial intelligence'. This cutting edge area of AI produces robots which, rather than being programmed from the head down by a computer brain, instead learn to function through the experience of their physical bodies.

The film introduces the robots to two performers, one man and one woman, trained in body awareness and acutely sensitive to the nuances of movement. These performers shed skins of soft fabric, bearing their joints like the frank structure of a machine, and then, naked, they perform a series of dances with the robots. Creating intimate relationships that are in turn tender, funny and eerie, they bend flexible human fantasy around tough materials.

Soft Materials creates a new image of 'man and machine', thus continuing Martin's aspiration to revisit the questions of the early Modern period. However, Soft Materials also connects with 1960's performance practices, which honed bodily relationships to physical objects; one inspiration for the project is Robert Morris's film, Neoclassical, which depicts an idealised interaction between his sculptures and two viewers. Created during what some call the 'Digital Revolution', the work sees a return to the physical object in an arena of embodied play. Ironically, the objects in question are technological creations, and ones that mimic our own animal physicality. Soft Materials takes to a new level Martin's ongoing concern with tangible fantasy and the power of artifice.

For a discussion of this work go to:
http://www.frieze.com/issue/review/daria_martin1/

Her own site:
http://www.dariamartin.com/films_3.htm

and Maureen Paley site has other images and information:
http://www.maureenpaley.com/

Catalogue Edited by Beatrix Ruf. Essay by Catherine Wood.
PUBLISHED BY: JRP/Ringier,2006
ISBN: 9783905701548

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Sam Durrant








Sam Durant has used installation, drawing, sculpture and text since the early 1990s to explore language and society, and how individuals and groups articulate their concerns publicly. Durant’s work takes a critical view of social, political and cultural issues, and explores the varying relationships between popular culture and fine art through a variety of materials and processes. His diverse subjects include the civil rights movement, southern rock music and modernist architecture. For the Biennale, the artist has created a series of illuminated signs containing de-contextualised quotes from placards used during protest demonstrations within the Aboriginal civil rights movement in Australia and from African American and Native American civil rights movements in the United States. It is art about the use and meaning of political language in society. - Biennale of Sydney 2008


For an interesting discussion of the relationship between Durant and Robert Smithson regarding Durant's remking of Simthson's partially buried woodshed ( involving, also Tacita Dean), please see the top link below
Further Links
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-10523458_ITM
http://www.artreview.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1474022%3ABlogPost%3A3276
http://www.frieze.com/issue/review/sam_durant/
http://www.blumandpoe.com/samdurant/flip.htm?index=39
http://www.blumandpoe.com/samdurant/flip.htm?index=11
http://www.blumandpoe.com/samdurant/flip.htm?index=12
http://www.heyokamagazine.com/HEYOKA.3.SCULPT.SAM%20DURANT.htm

A good catalogue is available in from the Elam Library
Details: Title- Sam Durant, Hatje Cantz Publishers, March 2, 2003)

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Mark Wallinger -State Britian




The following is the Wiki description of State Britain. The page itself provides interesting links you may wish to look at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Britain

State Britain is a meticulous recreation of a 40 metre long display which had originally been situated around peace campaigner Brian Haw's protest outside the Houses of Parliament against policies towards Iraq. The original display consisted of over 600 items, many donations from the public, including paintings, placards, banners, posters, graffiti, traffic cones, tarpaulins, temporary fencing and toys. These included a poster, "Blair Lies, Kids Die!", a banner, "Baby Killers", photos of babies maimed and burnt in missile attacks, a statement that parliament spent seven hours discussing the war in Iraq and 700 hours discussing fox-hunting, and a white teddy bear holding a sign, "Bears against bombs". In the centre is an image of Haw fixed to a wooden cross and wearing a t-shirt that says, "Bliar".
Haw's original display, apart from a three metre section, was confiscated by the police under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, which prohibits unauthorised protests in a specified "exclusion zone" around Parliament.
Mark Wallinger employed 15 people for 6 months and spent £90,000 to recreate it in its entirety. It was installed inside the Duveen Hall of Tate Britain in January 2007. Signs at all the entrances to the hall warn that the exhibit contains images of extreme human suffering.
The Sunday Times saw the show as more indication that the arts establishment had turned against the Labour government. It contrasted Tate director Sir Nicholas Serota's endorsement of Wallinger's show with the private tour of Tate Modern Serota had given to Prime Minister Tony Blair in 2000.[3] At that time Blair's government had courted Young British Artists such as Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst to help "modernise" Britain. State Britain was curated in collaboration with Wallinger by Tate curator, Clarrie Wallis. It is part of a series of contemporary sculpture commissions at the gallery. . State Britain was on show until August 27, 2007.

Wallinger was shortlisted for the Turner Prize on 8 May 2007 for State Britain,and announced the winner on 3 December 2007.



Further links
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/dec/14/aprotestoflove
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2007/dec/05/art.turnerprize2007
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jan/16/humanrights.politicsandthearts

For a useful bibliography see the latter part of the following page;
http://www.artnet.com/artist/17468/mark-wallinger.html



Mark Wallinger
Sleeper 2005
New National Gallery, Berlin

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Adam Chodzko




Below is a link to a brief description of Adam Chodzko's works in a show at Tate St Ives. I thought it was a good summary of a variable practise.

http://www.frieze.com/issue/review/adam_chodzko2/#When:16:25:00Z

Also at another site:
http://www.ridemedia.co.uk/adam/

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Conversational Task: Week5

The following is intended as an aid to conversation. Working in pairs please come to some conclusions regarding the questions below. They are intended to focus your thinking regarding the resolution processes you will be engaging with in order to present work for assessment.

Task
1. Make notes based on your conversation your partner (30 minutes)
2. Group discussion of outcomes,(20minutes)
3. Secondary consideration of issues raised, this will involve converting the notes made with your partner into a short piece of writing (300 words max). Please then send this to the 303 blog, as a comment, attaching it to the relevant post. This needs to be done by the weekend.

Starting Statement


There needs to be a process. A process has parts. These maybe within or outside of the work


Giving an account of the work
1.What did it begin with, eg a related experience, a memory, another artwork, etc

2.How did it end?

3.What can you say about the actions collected within your work?

4.How is it different from other things you’ve done?

5.In what way is it an experiment?

6.In what way is it an extension of things done before?

Editing
7.What criteria are you basing your selection on?

8.Are there criteria you have rejected?

9.What influences you more the idea or the result?

10.Have ideas been sorted through a process of consideration. How have you demonstrated this?